Bullying - Local Or Washington Solution?

y">how the local school should handle the bullying
Bullying is getting a lot of attention in the news. Isituation. Having a bureaucratic organization
hear the talking heads talking about the pros anddeciding such things from 2,000 miles away
cons of various approaches. What laws should bedoesn't make much sense to me.
enacted to counter bullying and what actionsImagine if schools were private organizations,
should be taken.competing for our hard-earned money. How do
That approach to bullying reminded me of myyou think bullying would be handled? Do you think
youth. Schools seemed much less complicatedthere would be as many attempts to ignore the
then. They didn't have as many regulations,concerns of the parents - the payers of the
requirements, diversity training, sensitivity training,administrators salary? Of course not, because
politically correct training, etc, that the have today.they could take their money elsewhere.
I remember that if you were picked on, youYou see, part of the problem with dealing with
could defend yourself, or a teacher would step inbullies, is that Washington is modeling bullying
(if they over heard or became aware of it). Thebehavior. They direct much of what a school can
teacher would let the perpetrator know theirand should do. And they have the power of the
bullying language or behavior would havepurse.
consequences. Parents would be called if thingsBullying in a private institution is handled much
got out of hand or crossed a line. Or parentsbetter because the school has a vested interest
requests to administrators were dealt within keeping the student and their parents happy -
effectively. This was my experience in privatethey are paying customers. When you remove
school, where my parents paid their 'taxes'the parents from the process, you remove a
directly to the school in the way of tuition.crucial dynamic in dealing with bullies.
My experience in junior high (a public school) wasI recognize bullying can be a serious issue. It can
much different. It wasn't much different thenhave serious consequences. As a parent, I like the
what I read about today. In the public debate,leverage I have when I'm a paying customer
every talking head and interest group have awhen a provider (a school) is worried I might
strong opinion on bullying. I look at it from aleaver and take my 'taxes' with me. By bringing
different point of view. First, this is what happensthe power of the purse back to the local
when you centralize decision making. We have tocommunities (school choice - and tax choice) we
send our kids to specific public schools, whereforce schools and parents to be more engaged.
they are basically trapped to attend unless weI've learned that people tend to model what you
want to home school or pay for private school -do regardless of what you say. So, ask the
on top of paying taxes for public schools whethergovernment to stop bullying schools on how to
our kids attend or not.handle these situations and give power back to
Since schools are more centralized, that meansthe parents.
Washington is getting directly involved in deciding