Constructivism: Why It's So Destructive

ructivism is a huge fad in contemporary education.teacher is to say, “Here is Japan. Tokyo is
Usually wrapped in big bouquets of jargon,the capital.” Kids can talk all day but they
Constructivism is not easy to evaluate. So what iswill never construct this information. So how do
this thing?kids learn any geography?
Used in a reasonable way, Constructivism is just aHow about history? Teachers used to point out
fancy word for the Socratic method, wherethe events and names, the dates, the battles, the
students talk their way into discovering newfamous personalities, and help students see the
insights. Here’s the ideal scenario. A grouprelationships and priorities among all these things.
of students, by discussion and argument, with littleBut in Constructivism teachers are not allowed to
nudges from a teacher, discover a destinationpoint out anything. Rather, the teacher is
they did not know existed. When educatorssupposed to script little journeys into the
promote Constructivism, they usually paint thisunknown, so that students create/discover/invent
happy picture.their own new knowledge. So how will they ever
The trouble is, our educators don’t knowlearn about the events of the French Revolution?
when to stop. In its more common form, theAdditionally, teachers are supposed to be familiar
theory of Constructivism insists that authenticwith the “prior knowledge” that
education occurs in only one way: children musteach student brings to the classroom. Think about
construct their own new knowledge. Meanwhile,the huge burden this entails. Not only must
teachers can no longer teach (i.e., be a sage on ateachers cease instructing, they must be
stage). They must guide from the side or, betterconcerned with any bits of knowledge that
still, prompt from the back of the room. Troublechildren already have in their heads. Do you
is, this process unfolds slowly and, due to timeremember a time when the whole point was to
constraints, concentrates on a few topics whileremedy the ignorance of students? Now the point
ignoring many others of equal value.is for teachers to pay homage to that very
Worst of all, Constructivism demands that classesignorance.
be organized in just the prescribed way. BeforePerhaps you are thinking that Constructivism
you know it, curricula must be rewritten, bookswould work better in math and science.
tossed out, schools and classrooms redesigned,I’m sure there are ideal scenarios where
and the training and responsibilities of teachersstudents could be maneuvered into discovering
overhauled. Thus a wisp of theory becomes ansomething, more or less for themselves. But
all-devouring hoax.these will be special cases, rare cases. Teachers
Here’s where Constructivism can end up.have to spend a lot of effort stage-managing
It legitimizes what students find time to invent,these eureka-moments. So on the one hand
and ignores everything else.teachers can’t teach, but on the other
The ignored things tend to be the traditionalhand they’re expected to be creators of
basics and academics, the material that kids usedBroadway scenes, all built around the tidbits which
to learn before Constructivism declaredchildren already know. It’s a lot to ask.
it’s no longer valid because the studentsYou can imagine how long the process takes.
did not themselves construct any of it! ForConstructivists scorn simply learning stuff. But in
example, if students don’t get around tomost subjects, most of the time, that is precisely
constructing George Washington, know what? Hewhat students need to do ASAP.
doesn’t exist.Constructivism seems to me another of those
Instead of being an all-purpose road to truth,poetically touted pedagogies that, at the end of
Constructivism can be highly selective, favoringthe year, result in less education, not more. I fear
the knowledge that children can be led toit’s in the same tradition as Whole Word,
discover. In practice, we’re talking about aNew Math and many other mirages so beloved
much reduced store of knowledge.by our educators. A better name is arguably
Let’s reflect on that “idealDestructivism.
scenario” where students discuss their(For complete analysis, see “34: The Con
way to an unseen destination. How would thatin Constructivism” on
work in geography? Traditionally, the job of theImprove-Education.org.