| Finance Minister released the draft of Direct Tax | | | | (so that they can save for their retired life) and |
| Code (DTC) for public discussions in August 2009. | | | | not for the retired persons who have to live on |
| CBDT (Central Board of Direct Taxes) released | | | | their savings of lifetime. |
| the Revised DTC discussion paper in June 2010 | | | | 3. EEE and EET Regime: The modified discussion |
| for inviting further comments on the modified | | | | paper on DTC has proposed to continue with the |
| proposals in DTC. Direct Taxes Code 2009 | | | | existing EEE (Exempt-Exempt-Exempt) regime for |
| expected to become effective from 1 April 2011, | | | | specified investment schemes such as GPF |
| shall replace India's antiquated Income Tax Act, | | | | (Government Provident Fund), PPF (Public |
| 1961, which is a major step in the direction of | | | | Provident Fund), RPF (Recognized Provident Fund), |
| much awaited tax reforms in India and which aims | | | | Pension Scheme administered by PFRDA (Pension |
| to simplify the tax regime radically. | | | | Fund Regulatory and Development Agency), |
| Let's see what are the implications for the Senior | | | | Term Life Insurance, and Annuity Schemes. In the |
| Citizens in the original draft and the revised | | | | original draft, the ministry had proposed to adopt |
| discussion paper on Direct Taxes Code | | | | EET (Exempt-Exempt-Tax) regime. It is a great |
| 1. Income Tax Rates and Income Slab: In the | | | | relief for the Senior Citizens, as they will not have |
| revised discussion paper, finance ministry has not | | | | to pay tax on their withdrawals from PF, or |
| made any changes in the Income Tax Rates and | | | | Pension. |
| Income Tax Slabs that were proposed in the | | | | 4. Retirement Benefits: As per the revised DTC, |
| original draft. That means there is no change in | | | | the retirement benefits such as gratuity, |
| the basic exemption limit for the Senior Citizens | | | | commuted pension, voluntary retirement |
| (resident individual of 65 years or above), which is | | | | compensation and leave encashment will be |
| 240,000 per year. However, with the increase in | | | | exempt from tax subject to specified limits. |
| the overall Tax Slabs (reduced tax rates), the net | | | | Original Draft DTC had proposed a scheme of |
| tax liability for Senior Citizens will work out to be | | | | deferment of tax on retirement benefits, that is, |
| lower than the present rates of income tax. | | | | the retirement benefits would not be taxed if it |
| Proposed Tax Slabs as per DTC are as under: | | | | were invested in a Special Retirement Benefit |
| - Income Exempt from Income Tax - up to | | | | Account, which would be subsequently taxed in |
| 240,000 for senior citizens (resident individual of | | | | the year of withdrawal. It is worth noting that in |
| 65 years or above), up to 190,000 for women, | | | | the earlier draft, the finance ministry had also |
| and up to 160,000 for all the other assesses | | | | proposed that Employer's Contribution to |
| - Income above the basic exemption limit up to | | | | Provident Fund, Superannuation Funds and Pension |
| 1,000,000 - Tax Rate 10% | | | | Schemes would be treated as income for the |
| - Income from 1,000,001 to 2,500,000 - Tax Rate | | | | employees. However, the Revised DTC has done |
| 20% | | | | away with this proposal. |
| - Income above 2,500,000 - Tax Rate 30% | | | | Summing Up: |
| 2. Tax Incentives for Savings: In the revised DTC, | | | | In the New DTC, be it in the original draft or in |
| there is no change in the limit of deductions from | | | | the revised discussion paper, there is nothing very |
| taxable income for savings in specified | | | | much special for the senior citizens except the |
| investments. In the original draft, the limit has | | | | higher income tax slabs and the corresponding |
| been proposed to be revised to 300,000 from | | | | reduced tax rates. If the basic exemption limit of |
| the present limit of 100,000 (under section 80C). | | | | 240,000 for senior citizens were revised |
| However, it should not make much difference to | | | | substantially, it would have definitely been a great |
| the Senior Citizens, as the tax incentives for | | | | boon to the Senior Citizens. |
| savings are basically meant for the youngsters | | | | |