Instructional Design Should Keep Expectations High

During his presidency, George W. Bush enactedIt is easy to assign standards to inanimate
"No Child Left Behind" to ensure the educationalobjects, but some argue that it cannot be applied
system of the United States produces high qualityto a standard of living. In a factory setting, when
students. While this move was somewhat political,something does not adhere to standards, it is
the message was important - but it was not thechanged, eliminated, altered or a number of other
first. Government statistics show the governmentsolutions. In the factory, the blame is placed on
has spent nearly $200 billion since 1965 tothe materials. In education, where do you place
improve the nation's educational system. Whatthe blame? You cannot change the student, even
may come as a surprise to some is that Bush'swith instructional design.
efforts have actually produced measurableGovernment leaders are starting to recognize this
improvements.problem and instead of looking to the students,
As a teacher, where do you fit in this effort tothey are now looking at the teachers. While these
make improvements? As a professional, you doindividuals play a critical role in the classroom and
your best, but is it good enough? In truth, yourin the quality of education delivered to students,
approach to instructional design will go a long waycan outcomes be changed simply by tightening
to producing the highest quality in the classroom.standards? Will it impact their expectations?
The problem is that not all teachers share theExpectations
same expectations for students. At the sameTeachers have specific expectations for their
time, not all teachers agree on what constitutesstudents. These expectations arise from their
quality. Some teachers might expect differentown beliefs and values, although they can also be
things out of a specific group of students whoinfluenced by outside sources. Changing standards
present different abilities, cultures orand associating them with a teacher's pay can
socioeconomic status.motivate teachers to spend more time with their
The problem with government spending is thatstudents and through instructional design, improve
these agencies do not recognize the source ofperformance. This is not, however, changing
low expectations as displayed in instructionalexpectations.
design and instead just raise the expectationsIt is important for these programs to address the
through mandated programs and higher standards.changes that are necessary to improve overall
These policies suggest that standards andperformance. In understanding where teachers
expectations are linked in some direct way.obtain their basis for their expectations, policy
Proving whether or not they are can make themakers can influence the necessary changes to
difference in seeing if these programs aresee measureable improvements in the education
successful.system. These improvements can be obvious in
Standardthe instructional design and in overall scores.
Standards were at one point more at home in aIn reality, standards and expectations are not the
factory setting than the educational system. Insame thing. Until policy makers understand the
essence, a standard is an external criteria againstdifference, it is unlikely this overall system will
which certain "products" are measured. Accordingchange to ensure no child is actually left behind.
to Diane Ravitch, author of National Standards inIf you're ready to start experiencing the benefits
American Education: A Citizen's Guide, suggestedof using video in the classroom, your next step is
that standards improved the daily lives ofto download a free copy of "The 7 Biggest
Americans and could also improve theMistakes Teachers Make Using Video in the
effectiveness of American education.Classroom" by clicking on the link below right now.