Passing Rates Keep Plummeting as States Race to the Top

>this competition is based on methods which are
Race to the Top finalists announced on Tuesdayanti-teacher and anti-student by their essence”,
is currently the most discussed event on the— said Matthew Barney, economic expert
education agenda. The second round of theand Race to the Top consistent opponent.
competition for $4,3 billion state award yieldedThe recent events show that critics are right. The
positive results but also sparkled the new waverace to the Top Program has brought new
of controversy over the raise of state schoolsrepercussions to one of its major applicants
testing standards.— New York.
Speaking at the National Press Club in WashingtonAs it is known, in order to qualify for the Race to
on Tuesday, Education Secretary Arne Duncanthe Top funds, states must agree to develop
announced 19 winners of the second round of thestate standards aligned to the Common Core
Race to the Top Program.Standards. This move was tasked to reduce the
The finalists appeared to be Arizona, California,overall downgrade of the state exams, but
Colorado, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia,brought new controversy instead as more
Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,students started failing their tests after standards
Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Northwere raised.
Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, andAs the problem unfolds, NY state education
South Carolina, with each receiving over 400officials announced Wednesday that more than
points in the 500-point evaluating scale.half of public school students in New York City
While round 1 brought victory to only two Statesfailed their English exams this year, and only 54
— Delaware and Tennessee — thepercent of them passed in math.
significant increase in Round 2 winners shows their“Now that we are facing the hard truth that
greater involvement in the reform process.not all of the gains were as advertised, we have
The $4,3 billion award winners — from 10to take a look at what we can do differently”,
to 15 states, according to Mr. Duncan — willMerryl H. Tisch, the chancellor of the State Board
be announced in September. He stressed the finalof Regents, said.
number will depend on the size of the statesThe slump in passing rates has been seen
winning the most points.statewide. This year 61 percent of state students
The controversial program received warmwere expected to pass a grade in math, as
responses from many experts, with such thinkcompared with 86 percent last year. The situation
tanks as Achieve Inc. and WestEd (educationwith English is even worse, with only 53 percent
research groups) calling it viable and coherent. Thepassing, compared with last year’s 77
supporters indicate the program spurspercent.
states’ competition for education reform.Test standards were raised after continuous
Since its inception, 23 states have passedclaims of them becoming too easy, with questions
reforms aimed at increase of charter schools andrepeating from year to year. So this year, the
amending the teaching staff evaluation system.state made them less predictable and increased
“The [stimulus package] has unleashed anthe number of correct answers needed to pass
avalanche of pent-up educational reform activitythe test. Last year, for example, a fourth grader
at the state and at the local level,” Mr. Duncanhad to get 37 out of 70 possible points on the
said.math test to reach Level 3 (out of 4), or grade
New York, for example, has more than doubledlevel. This year, a fourth grader needed to earn
its number of charter schools and tied teacher51 out of 70 points to reach that level.
evaluations to schools performance. ColoradoThe worrying test results not only threaten to
passed a major overhaul of teacher tenure andundermine the whole grading system but also
evaluation rules, despite staunch union opposition.raise questions over the efficiency of
Louisiana pushed the law that stipulates moreObama-advocated program, particularly in terms
rigorous evaluation procedure for teachers.of school evaluation system which ties test
However, the program is subject to fierceresults to teachers’ performance and thus
criticism as well. Critics point at its totally wrongdetermines their pay and bonuses.
timing when state education budgets cannotMeanwhile, it has already cast shadow over NY
afford the long-term competition. They alsoAdministration achievements over the past years,
worry that the program lacks strategic thinkingwith the mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Schools
and seeks to improve the K-12 system withChancellor Joel I. Klein using the old results of
dubious methods.the-then downgraded test standards to show
“Providing money for education basing upon thestate schools have improved.
competition is a totally wrong move. Especially if