Simplifying Middle Schooling in Australia

Over the years many issues have been debatedstructure. If a curriculum is based on questions,
in regards to their impact on student learning andthen class time must be based on seeking
engagement in the middle years. It is now at theanswers to those questions. If students are not
stage that it is becoming too complicated for thegiven responsibility for answering the questions
average teacher to sift through and work outthemselves, then integrated curriculum ceases to
what is important, and where to begin to make ahave significance. Why would you spend your
start. Although a large body of research has beentime seeking an answer that you knew was going
conducted, it has rarely been synthesized into ato be corrected soon anyway? If we are dealing
usable form that can be applied easily bywith significant problems then there will not be
teachers. This paper aims to sort through theonly one answer, so multiple interpretations must
various issues at play, and determine which arebe allowed. Simple answers only occur for simple
really important for the average classroomproblems, not complex and significant ones. So, if
teacher to understand and to implement.students are given responsibility for seeking
One of the most helpful statements on middleanswers to questions, then the class structure
schooling that I have ever found was written bymust be arranged to encourage this. Students
American educator, James Beane in 1996:must be given time to seek answers and the
"We believe that young people have a right to beresponsibility for finding answers. If they have
intelligent, to be well informed, to search fortruly been given the responsibility for finding
meaning in their world, to be engaged withanswers to significant problems, then the
significant issues, to do authentic work, to learnauthority structure must not dictate when, where,
the whole story, to think critically, to form values,how and in what context they may work. This
to make judgments, to be respected." (Beane,would negate their responsibility for finding the
1996, p.48)answers. The class timetable and authority
Instead of speaking in terms of curriculumstructure must necessarily be negotiated with
development or organizational structure, Beaneindividuals in their situation rather than being applied
addresses directly the rights and needs of youngin a top-down structure that lacks flexibility.
adolescents. These are incidentally rights that weWhen students come up with real answers to
adults tend to take for granted. We getsignificant questions, it is unlikely that all of their
frustrated at work when what we are doinganswers will be the same. Traditional assessment
seems to require a low level of thinking andstructures are often based on producing the
engagement from us, has very little meaning in'correct' answer to a question. How could these
the real world, is never going to be used forstructures fit with questions that do not produce
anything significant, shows only a partial view of'correct' answers? Instead we must use authentic
the issue, requires no informed judgments fromassessment - that which involves integration of
us, and when we do not have the respect of ourknowledge and has value beyond mere evaluation
colleagues and bosses. It is therefore hardlypurposes. If we are using real life questions, then
surprising that young adolescents experienceit makes sense that we would assess their real
similar frustrations when we make their schoolinglife answers and applications. This may mean that
such that they feel stupid, poorly informed, unableevery student produces different assessment
to do anything of real world significance, forced toforms. We must be flexible, and not think that
sit for assessment that has little point, littleone form is better than another. Students must
significance and no relation to tasks in the realbe allowed to demonstrate what they have
world, unable to express opinions and makelearned in real-life contexts, over time periods, and
judgments, and failing to earn any respect fromon multiple occasions.
peers or adults. Frankly, if I was forced to workSo how do these address student developmental
under those conditions I would have resigned longneeds?
ago.Competence and achievement
It comes as no surprise therefore that weStudents undergoing a program of curriculum
experience significant disengagement fromintegration achieve at a higher level than their
schooling by young adolescents. Imagine thepeers (Aitkin, 1942 - in Beane, 1997). Achieving at
average class of year nine boys and you willhigher levels increases the sense of competence.
generally not be imagining students who are"Curriculum integration is known for giving more
excited about learning, motivated about theiryoung people more access to knowledge; for
assessment and involved in school decision making.encouraging them to be intelligent, to use their
They are unlikely to put in more than theminds critically and creatively; for using knowledge
minimum effort, and that only if they consider thein more sophisticated ways; and for giving young
subject studied to be important for laterpeople a chance to use knowledge for problem
schooling, university or career moves in spite ofsolving" (Beane, 1996, p.10). This can cause
its seeming irrelevance now. It requires aproblems in certain spheres as some adults fear
significant level of dedication and motivation togiving students too much access to knowledge
continue on working and learning in a situation thatand power.
actively opposes most self-determiningSelf-exploration and definition
behaviours."The central focus of curriculum integration is the
A number of educational theorists have writtensearch for self- and social meaning" (Beane, 1995,
about adolescent developmental needs. Thesep.616). Therefore by definition it meets the
have been studied to determine what it is thatdevelopmental needs for self exploration and
adolescents need to be engaged in schooling. Adefinition, as well as growing awareness of the
relatively comprehensive list includes the following:social and political world.
The need for -Positive social interactions with peers and adults
1. Competence and achievement therebyAccording to Beane, the emphasis in IC is on
improving self-confidence.teacher-student and student-student collaboration,
2. Self-exploration and definition opportunities.which is necessary for curriculum planning and
3. Positive social interaction with adults and peers.negotiation. Themes such as "getting along with
4. Physical activity.others" also promote this (Beane, 1997).
5. Meaningful participation in families, school andPhysical Activity
communities.IC does not seem to promote physical activity
6. Routine, structure and clear limits, together withexcept as a by-product of a constructivist
growth towards independence.approach.
7. Diversity.Meaningful participation in families, school and
8. Opportunities to explore concepts and generatecommunities.
ideas from concrete experiences. To think inWhile there is not clear data showing an increase
ways that become more abstract and reflective.in family, school and community participation, the
9. Opportunities to explore values and decisionwork by Pate, Homestead and McGinnis (1997)
making, and growing awareness of the social andindicates that students in an IC classroom look
political world.increasingly towards families and communities for
10. Creative expression.information and resources. In their year-long
(Eyers, 1992; NMSA, 2000a; Van Hoose andstudy, the McHome team found that family and
Strahan, 1988).community involvement increased during their IC
A good summary of this is the finding by theprogram.
Schools Council in 1994 that in order to beRoutine, structure and clear limits, together with
effective, "middle schooling should be challenging,growth towards independence.
filled with variety, responsive to the learningSetting up a democratic classroom based on
needs, interests and concerns of youngnotions of rights and responsibilities is fundamental
adolescents and empower its students withto any IC program (Apple and Beane, 1995).
self-confidence and a respect for learning"Ideally, the class members would decide together
(Berkley, 1994, p.10).on regulations for conduct (Pate, Homestead and
Many school organizational aspects have beenMcGinnis, 1997), thereby understanding and
considered to determine their impact on theseappreciating the routines and limits. In an IC
developmental needs. These include: authority andclassroom students would also negotiate the
power structure, personnel practices, professionalcurriculum with the classroom teacher and thus
development of teachers, curriculum design,have a clear understanding of the structure from
pedagogical practices, assessment and evaluation,the start (Beane, 1997).
parental and community involvement, schedulingDiversity.
practices and teacher/student ratios in learningDiversity in IC comes from a curriculum that deals
communities. See the Figure 1 below for adirectly with student concerns. Student concerns
comparison of these organisational aspectsare varied (Beane, 1997), and often show
between "traditional schooling" and what is beingevidence of deep thinking about the world that
termed "middle schooling".we are living in. The very nature of these
Organizational Aspect Traditional schooling Middleconcerns demands diversity in curriculum. This
schoolingneed for diversity is actually a concern for some
Authority/power structure Top down Democratic.teachers who feel ill-prepared for dealing with a
Teachers empowered as decision makers.curriculum with which they have no familiarity
Student input in all decisions. Negotiation as the(George, 1996). However, teachers with a real
key (Apple and Beane, 1995).concern for adolescents need to be prepared to
Personnel practices Individual teachers / subjectput aside their fears and insecurities, and focus
teams Inter-disciplinary teams (Maciver, 1990).instead on what is best for their students.
Professional development Little/none Regular andOpportunities to explore concepts and generate
often as the basis for improving practice.ideas from concrete experiences.
Curriculum design Discipline based IntegratedTo think in ways that become more abstract and
curriculum based on students personal and socialreflective.
concerns without regard for subject-areaAccording to Beane (1991, p.9), "genuine learning
boundaries (Beane, 1996).involves interaction with the environment in such a
Pedagogical practices Lectures and textbooksway that what we experience becomes
Based on constructivist principles (hands on, mindsintegrated into our system of meaning". This
on) and Project/ problem based learning (Pate,interaction with the environment is fundamental to
Homestead and McGinnis, 1997).a constructive approach of exploring concepts and
Assessment and evaluation Tests Authenticgenerating ideas from concrete experiences
Assessment: disciplined inquiry, integration of(Appleton, 1997; Tippins, Tobin and Nichols, 1995).
knowledge and value beyond evaluation (Burke,Beane also argues that as IC opens a way for
1997).critical inquiry into real issues, knowledge is pushed
Parent and community involvement Little/noneto the level of problem solving and application
High (Fry, 1994).(Beane, 1997). This would promote abstract and
Scheduling practices 40 or 50 minute set periodsreflective thinking.
Flexible timetable involving large blocks of timeOpportunities to explore values and decision
(Hackman and Valentine, 1998; Fogarty, 1997).making, and growing awareness of the social and
Learning communities Large student: teacher ratiopolitical world.
Small learning communities (Felner et al, 1997a).IC provides for exploration of values and decision
Many of the organisational aspects of middlemaking in both the personal and social worlds,
schooling included above were recommendationsbecause of its basis in the personal and social
of the Carnegie Council's "Turning Points" report:concerns of students. True curriculum integration
National and State Recommendations forfits closely with Symes and Preston's notion of an
Transforming Middle -Grades Educationemancipatory perspective, one that is
Create small, personalized communities for"emancipatory and empowering for teacher and
learning.student alike, within a context of social justice"
Teach a core academic program.(Symes and Preston, 1997, p.73), and has "a
Ensure success for all students.bifocal commitment to the individual and society"
Empower teachers and administrators to make(Symes and Preston, 1997, p.77). Such an
key pedagogical, management, and budgetaryapproach attempts to avoid the selective political
decisions.ideologies which play more than a small role in the
Staff middle-grades schools with teachers who"sort and select" system inherent in the separate
are specially trained to teach young adolescents.subject approach (Beane, 1995).
Improve academic performance through fosteringCreative expression.
the health and fitness of young adolescents.Within an Integrated Curriculum meanings are
Reengage families in the education of youngcreated by the students and not imposed by
adolescents.adults (Beane, 1991). This leaves room for a great
Connect schools with communities.deal of creative expression by students,
Figure 1 from Felner et al, 1997aparticularly when used in conjunction with
While each of these aspects is important in middleconstructive pedagogy, project based learning and
schooling, some are more important than others. Iauthentic assessment.
believe that running an integrated curriculum withEffective Middle Schooling:
authentic assessment in a democratic classroomEffective middle schooling is organized in such a
fulfils all of the student developmental needs, andway that it meets the developmental needs of
is much simpler to manage for the averageadolescents. It is democratic in nature, based on
classroom teacher.principles of negotiation. Students and teachers
Integrated curriculum is not using a themework together in small communities with parents
oriented approach and seeing what each subjectand community members, and are responsible for
can contribute. Although this is often a goodmaking decisions about their teaching and learning.
starting point, it is not the end product. CurriculumTogether they study issues that are of personal
integration involves basing the learning experienceand social significance to them. As they actively
on significant issues and problems that have beencreate meaning through concrete experiences,
collaboratively identified by teachers and students,they learn about the world around them and how
without regard for separate subject boundariesit operates. In such a context the learning is also
(Beane, 1997). It does not ignore subject specificthe assessment, and has value outside the
knowledge, but acknowledges that if we startclassroom. Limited time is not an issue, because
with the answers instead of the questions thenthe schedule is dependent on the learning, not the
we miss a vital part of the learning process andother way around. Professional development
end up with an inferior product. It does not teachtakes place continually.
maths and English and science, but teachesEffective middle schooling cannot be achieved just
students how to solve problems that involveby changing the organizational aspects of
knowledge from a wide range of sources whichtraditional schooling. It requires an ideological
may or may not include knowledge fromchange on the part of educators and
traditional subjects.administrators alike (Norton and Lewis, 2000). But
Integrated curriculum cannot be achieved in aas Felner et al (1997b) show, for those who
classroom which has a traditional authoritypersist with change the rewards are many.