What experts see in Ulips !

When it comes to Ulips, it appears that there arepolicyholders wanting to terminate Ulips after
no shades of grey: you either love them or hatethree years because they believed three years
them. To put it in black and white, the industrywas its tenure. That's why advice is important.
and potential purchasers love them, and most ofInvestors must understand their own profile to
the people who have them tend to hate them.make the most of products that are meant to
Accusations of mis-selling and hard-selling areaddress a financial goal or need. We are a very
hurled at the industry. Most investors admit thatstrongly regulated market. The stringent solvency
they don't understand how it works, but theymargins ensure that the consumer's interest is
keep buying Ulips more than any other insuranceforemost for us.
product. Hence, all kinds of records are beingDevendra Nevgi, CEO & CIO, Quantum,
broken: there is an unprecedented growth in theAMC"We specially advertised that a fund we
number of Ulips sold and in the collection oflaunched wasn't for those looking for short-term
premiums. All of this serves to boost the causegains."
of privatisation. This is why we decided to makeDistributors are largely reponsible for rampant
Ulips the subject of the first Money Today Roundmis-selling. They are not advisers and many are
Table, held in Mumbai last month.not qualified because our testing is not stringent.
Since a number of investors (existing andIt's easy to lay the onus on investors' lack of
prospective) purchase Ulips without knowing muchawareness, but every financial product must
about them, we felt it was the job of a magazineexplain its costs and risks. Charges, costs and
like ours to give them more information. But whatreturns are very important because they indicate
are the industry stakeholders insurance firms,the tangible benefits of a product. Today, I do not
distributors and advisers doing about it?know how much of my money insurers or mutual
Surprisingly, many of them, who participated infunds spend. For instance, on an investment of Rs
the discussion, admitted that there was rampant100, I get a statement that reflects a balance of
mis-selling. But in the same breath they addedRs 98; it does not tell me where the rest of the
that the system had become corrupted and theymoney has gone.
were only the byproducts of the system . TheyProduct standardisation is essential for Ulips. There
felt that the consumers didn't wish to behas to be a way to compare performance,
(seriously) involved at the time that they boughtsomething that the mutual fund industry has
a financial product.successfully done. Ulips account for 90% of the
When we prodded the experts, they admittednew business; most probably it is riding a cycle.
that agents push potential buyers to opt for UlipsSuch unsustainable growth needs to be checked
instead of other insurance products that mightfor the good of the industry as well as that of
suit the latter better. Even the productthe investors.
manufacturers were blamed for not being able toRanjeet S Mudholkar, CEO, Financial Planning
realise the opaqueness in the manner in whichStandards Board of India"Agents give service not
they operated. An additional complication aroseas per rules but to further the interest of the
since it is extremely difficult to compare differentcompanies they represent."
Ulip products. Many said that even the insuranceAlmost everyone is duly diligent about the mobile
regulator might be unable to solve the basiche buys, compares features and finally goes to
problems that the industry faces today.the shop that offers the best discount. But when
As a part of the Round Table, we invited sixit comes to buying a financial product, most just
industry representatives to brainstorm and discusssay: I signed the document at the marked points.
where the Ulips were headed, and the problemsI think that as long as the rules are not
that confront the industry at present.compromised and and a product delivers what it
The panelists were: Pranav Mishra, seniorpromises, it is good. Investors must consider two
vicepresident and head (products), ICICI Prudentialimportant factors: asset allocation and costs
Life Insurance, V. Srinivasan, CFO, Bharti AXA Lifeincurred to get the best allocation. To this end,
Insurance, Ajay Bagga, CEO, Lotus India MutualUlips allow the best outcome from a single
Fund, Devendra Nevgi, CEO & CIO, Quantumproduct.
AMC, Jagdish Bhat, principal officer, AmbitThe capital structure of insurance firms is such
Insurance Broking & Advisory, and Ranjeetthat they are tightly regulated. We have to
S. Mudholkar, CEO of the Financial Planningmaintain stringent solvency margins. As insurance
Standards Board of India. Acting as moderatoris a long-term product, there are cost and
was R. Krishnamurthy, managing director, Watsoninvestment calls that we can take, unlike in many
Wyatt Insurance Consulting, who kicked off themutual funds. The insurance regulator has
debate by raising four important aspectsstandardised a sales guideline, which stipulates that
concerning Ulips product structure, regulatorythe agent must illustrate the product benefit, the
issues, distribution and, finally, customer service.value of investment and take consent from the
He thought that the structure of the productsclient at the time of the sale. There is a place for
was not transparent. There was no point inboth funds and Ulips as long as customers
clubbing insurance features with those ofunderstand what they are getting.
investment. Archaic laws led to distribution-relatedV Srinivasan, CFO, Bharti AXA Life Insurance"The
issues, and the less said about customer service,impact of upfront charges is lower compared with
the better. We present how thesethe annual charges of other products."
representatives responded to these issues.An insurance agent is tied to an insurer and so is
Excerpts from the debate:bound to sell its products, which may not serve
Pranav Mishra, Senior Vice-President and Headthe purpose of the client. This is a huge stumbling
(Products), ICICI Prudential Life Insurance"It's notblock as it discourages agents from selling the
just Ulips; even mutual fund investors don't knowbest product.
what fund they own or why they bought it."Advice must be unbiased. If it is influenced by the
We have a very young population 500 millioncompany that is represented, it is not advice but
below 30 years. Of the 320 million working people,sale. To a large extent, the certified financial
87% have no retirement pension. That apart, ofplanner (CFP) certification takes into account such
the 90 million senior citizens, a large chunk has nolacunae. Irda exempts CFP certificants from
pension protection or virtually no retirement plan.taking the mandated 50-hour training from the
Surveys show that Indians plan retirement withtied insurer which focuses on educating the agent
life insurance and bank deposits. Nowhere in theabout their product suite and nothing else.
world does this happen.I appreciate Irda for being a proactive regulator.
Worse, people start thinking of retirement veryThe new Ulip guidelines issued in December 2005
late in life in their 40s and 50s. The political classfor change in product structure was the first step.
has done lasting damage to the nation's investingIn August 2007, it sought greater transparency
pool by postponing pension reforms. This is whywith a fixed 6% and 10% on benefit illustration.
Ulips have served as a retirement-planning tool forAnd in January 2008, the regulator insisted on
Indians in the past few years. This has effectivelypolicy illustration to indicate all charges and the IRR
transferred a lot of individual wealth to theof the product. But the regulator needs more
distributors, and it builds their nest eggs instead ofteeth; until such time, agents will continue to
that of the customers.function in the interest of their principal
Then comes the issue of agent commission. Tillorganisations.
recently, there was no transparency or adequateJagdish Bhat, Principal Officer, Ambit Insurance
disclosures. Changes have to be legislative. TheBroking & Advisory"Some fund agents ask
product design should be simple and at least theclients to churn holdings every 18 months and buy
default option should be easy and low-cost. Onlynew, similar funds."
then should a product be allowed in the publicAn intermediary's role is to protect the
domain.consumers' interests. The biggest challenge is to
Ajay Bagga, CEO, Lotus India AMC"Of 100explain why they must understand their insurance
customers, 85 hold their returns, 10 compare itneeds before looking for a product. Often, I come
with the benchmark and only 5 compare it withacross a consumer who wants a specific product
peers."from a specific company. The reason: a friend
Banks and mutual funds were the first to gainmade good money from it. That this person is 40
from liberalisation, with insurance companiesand his friend is 25 and that they both have
setting up operations seven-eight years ago. Overcompletely different financial needs and risk
the past 15 years, consumers have evolved andprofiles is not considered.
adapted to the financial products launched in thisThe primary reason for life insurance is protection,
period. The shift from NSC and PPF-like productsfor which term plans are best. But when a
to mutual funds is good. But investors are stillconsumer figures that he gets nothing in return
unaware of their risk appetites, and the benefitsfrom the premiums, he loses interest in them.
and limitations of financial products. AllUlips were conceived to combine protection with
organisations, banks, fund houses, wealthinvestment. They are transparent and regulated,
managers, brokers, even insurers, try to educateso there's uniformity in charges. As a product
consumers.category, insurance was the first (and the only)
Our entire distribution service is a pure transactionto offer a free-look period, wherein one can
model and it often happens that a consumer isreturn a policy within a month if he realises it is
sold a product that he later realises was not whatunsuitable. This checks mis-selling to a large
he wanted. There have been instances ofextent.